From 29c07aa9dbeb622a6f8f0d1d07c9f139e18b5dca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Herbert Thielen Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:19:45 +0200 Subject: remove Yob's comma mentioned in issue #1105 --- googlemock/docs/CookBook.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'googlemock/docs/CookBook.md') diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index 6ea7f3a9..fa2d2fd0 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ Note that the mock class doesn't define `AppendPacket()`, unlike the real class. That's fine as long as the test doesn't need to call it. Next, you need a way to say that you want to use -`ConcretePacketStream` in production code, and use `MockPacketStream` +`ConcretePacketStream` in production code and to use `MockPacketStream` in tests. Since the functions are not virtual and the two classes are unrelated, you must specify your choice at _compile time_ (as opposed to run time). -- cgit v1.2.3 From bb8399e1baf9d984894a54ba1e6e9e4d20c11a35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Herbert Thielen Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:20:46 +0200 Subject: use plural verb as mentioned in issue #1105 --- googlemock/docs/CookBook.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'googlemock/docs/CookBook.md') diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index fa2d2fd0..753c6dd3 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ type `m` accepts): 1. When both `T` and `U` are built-in arithmetic types (`bool`, integers, and floating-point numbers), the conversion from `T` to `U` is not lossy (in other words, any value representable by `T` can also be represented by `U`); and 1. When `U` is a reference, `T` must also be a reference (as the underlying matcher may be interested in the address of the `U` value). -The code won't compile if any of these conditions isn't met. +The code won't compile if any of these conditions aren't met. Here's one example: -- cgit v1.2.3 From b70cf1a663ad30f77ab9867095a87d3d5429450d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:31:13 +0100 Subject: Use gender-neutral pronouns in comments and docs --- googlemock/docs/CookBook.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'googlemock/docs/CookBook.md') diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index 753c6dd3..3d07e68b 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is: * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called. - * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. + * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, they can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning. However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call" warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all -- cgit v1.2.3