From c8510504ddf3bd9e486fdce076bdf5dba62d18bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Holsapple Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 22:06:00 -0800 Subject: Fixed typos --- googlemock/docs/CookBook.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'googlemock/docs/CookBook.md') diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index 3d07e68b..c2565f1e 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ that references the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be deleted. Therefore, if you have some complex matcher that you want to use again -and again, there is no need to build it everytime. Just assign it to a +and again, there is no need to build it every time. Just assign it to a matcher variable and use that variable repeatedly! For example, ``` @@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ edge from node A to node B wherever A must occur before B, we can get a DAG. We use the term "sequence" to mean a directed path in this DAG. Now, if we decompose the DAG into sequences, we just need to know which sequences each `EXPECT_CALL()` belongs to in order to be able to -reconstruct the orginal DAG. +reconstruct the original DAG. So, to specify the partial order on the expectations we need to do two things: first to define some `Sequence` objects, and then for each @@ -2182,7 +2182,7 @@ the implementation object dies, the implementation object will be deleted. If you have some complex action that you want to use again and again, -you may not have to build it from scratch everytime. If the action +you may not have to build it from scratch every time. If the action doesn't have an internal state (i.e. if it always does the same thing no matter how many times it has been called), you can assign it to an action variable and use that variable repeatedly. For example: -- cgit v1.2.3