From a2bf0ea1706f501b44b538b9a14270657a1b92de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Gaynor Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:15:37 -0400 Subject: Mention that blake2 is not vulnerable to length-extension attacks (#3118) * Mention that blake2 is not vulnerable to length-extension attacks * SHA is sort of like a word, in the sense that I want the spellcheck to shut up about it * rephrase --- docs/hazmat/primitives/cryptographic-hashes.rst | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'docs/hazmat/primitives') diff --git a/docs/hazmat/primitives/cryptographic-hashes.rst b/docs/hazmat/primitives/cryptographic-hashes.rst index b0e9c16a..fd5f35d9 100644 --- a/docs/hazmat/primitives/cryptographic-hashes.rst +++ b/docs/hazmat/primitives/cryptographic-hashes.rst @@ -120,7 +120,9 @@ SHA-2 family BLAKE2 ~~~~~~ -`BLAKE2`_ is a cryptographic hash function specified in :rfc:`7693`. +`BLAKE2`_ is a cryptographic hash function specified in :rfc:`7693`. BLAKE2's +design makes it immune to `length-extension attacks`_, an advantage over the +SHA-family of hashes. .. note:: @@ -224,3 +226,4 @@ Interfaces .. _`Lifetimes of cryptographic hash functions`: http://valerieaurora.org/hash.html .. _`BLAKE2`: https://blake2.net +.. _`length-extension attacks`: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_extension_attack -- cgit v1.2.3