| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add flags to allow libflashrom users to configure how operations that
include unreadable or unwritable regions should be behave.
If the flags are set to true, a read/write operation will just skip the
inaccessible region and will still be executed in other regions.
If the flags are set to false, the inaccessible region will cause the
entire operation to fail.
BUG=b:260440773
BRANCH=none
TEST=builds
Change-Id: I9b96fb04b863625d2c9f9a00b97c35b3ddb0871b
CoAuthored-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/70128
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Perform the check right in read_wp_bits() as it's used by various WP
operations and also because its results won't make sense if WPS bit is
on and can't be changed.
Change-Id: I143186066a1d3af89809b7135886cb8b0d038085
Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/66836
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using "B" letter for "block protection" in TEST_* macros.
Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/377
Change-Id: I791400889159bc6f305fb05f3e2dd9a90dbe18a4
Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/68179
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Projects using libflashrom like fwupd expect the user to wait for the
operation to complete. To avoid the user thinking the process has
"hung" or "got stuck" report back the progress complete of the erase,
write and read operations.
Add a new --progress flag to the CLI to report progress of operations.
Include a test for the dummy spi25 device.
TEST=./test_build.sh; ./flashrom -p lspcon_i2c_spi:bus=7 -r /dev/null --progress
Change-Id: I7197572bb7f19e3bdb2bde855d70a0f50fd3854c
Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes <richard@hughsie.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/49643
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The doxygen documentation was in the libflashrom.c file. Move the
documentation to the libflashrom.h file. This allows foreign function
interface binding generators (eg rust bindgen) that operate on the .h
file to generate documentation for the target language. Some doxygen
errors were also corrected, mostly undocumented or wrongly labeled
parameters.
To test, I have diffed and inspected the doxygen documentation before
and after the change. All functions are documented the same, and the
structs and enums are now also included in the docs.
Change-Id: I856b74d5bfea13722539be15496755a95e701eea
Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63903
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
|
Move all header files to the new `include` directory.
Adapt include directives and build systems to the new directory.
Change-Id: Iaddd6bbfa0624b166d422f665877f096983bf4cf
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felix.singer@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58622
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
|
