| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds a generic framework to allow opaque programmers to
implement writeprotect operations and uses the framework to support
writeprotect operations on linux MTD device files.
The generic framework comprises three new functions in
`struct opaque_master` that are called from libflashrom:
- wp_write_cfg()
- wp_read_cfg()
- wp_get_ranges()
For linux_mtd, only the read/write functions are implemented. Linux's
MTD interface doesn't provide a way to get available ranges, so calling
get_wp_ranges() on the linux_mtd master will return
FLASHROM_WP_ERR_RANGE_LIST_UNAVAILABLE.
BUG=b:182223106
BRANCH=none
TEST=WP ops on hana DUT (MT8173) with W25Q32DW flash
TEST=flashrom --wp-enable --wp-range <non-empty> succeeds
TEST=flashrom --wp-enable --wp-range <empty> fails as expected
TEST=flashrom --wp-disable --wp-range <empty> succeeds
TEST=flashrom --wp-disable --wp-range <non-empty> fails as expected
TEST=flashrom --wp-status succeeds
Change-Id: I5c86e28cdec44bec49ba1d36f8ab62241b9b01da
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/61897
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make the linux_mtd driver treat any negative return value from the
MEMERASE ioctl as an error. Previously it only treated -1 as an error.
BUG=b:213561594,b:210973586,b:182223106
BRANCH=none
TEST=builds
Change-Id: I40cfbdee2ab608fbe6c17d9cac6ec53ff224d9a4
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60996
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows opaque masters to register shutdown function in
opaque_master struct, which means there is no need to call
register_shutdown in init function, since this call is now a part
of register_opaque_master.
As a consequence of using new API, two things are happening here:
1) No resource leakage anymore in case register_shutdown() would fail,
2) Fixed propagation of register_opaque_master() return values.
BUG=b:185191942
TEST=1) builds and ninja test including CB:56413
2) on ARMv7 device
flashrom -p linux_mtd -V
-> using linux_mtd, chip found
Change-Id: Id8471a117556edcbf9694752fabe05cf4501ce70
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56825
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch prepares opaque masters to use new API which allows to
register shutdown function in opaque_master struct. See also later
patch in this chain, where opaque masters are converted to new API.
BUG=b:185191942
TEST=builds and ninja test
Comparing flashrom binary before and after the patch,
make clean && make CONFIG_EVERYTHING=yes VERSION=none
binary is the same
Change-Id: I5000cfceeba859a76177a17c1cb7d1c1e9fc03fe
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56824
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Param is only used in the first half of init function, and it is
local, so there is no need to keep it until the end. This makes
handling error paths in the second half of init function shorter,
because those paths can just return 1 instead of going to a label.
BUG=b:185191942
TEST=builds and ninja test from CB:56413
Change-Id: I126a8d06297ef4d42bc93a73f7067ccc1352d1e9
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/56822
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I3d02bd789f0299e936eb86819b3b15b5ea2bb921
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heijligen <thomas.heijligen@secunet.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/52946
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simply provide an initialiser or use a direct assignment instead.
Change-Id: I07385375cd8eec8a95874001b402b2c17ec09e09
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/55267
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pass pointers to dynamically allocated data to
register_opaque_master(). This way we can avoid a mutable global.
BUG=b:185191942
TEST=builds
Change-Id: I160810cd67f782131962e96fc6d20e2987fb0390
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54171
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was impossible to register a const struct opaque_master that would
point to dynamically allocated `data`. Fix that so that we won't
have to create more mutable globals.
BUG=b:185191942
TEST=builds
Change-Id: Id3adb4cf04ae04dbe87ddb96f30871cb5f7c8ff0
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/54170
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=b:161951062
BRANCH=none
TEST=builds
Change-Id: I2503c98e9111d1fecd911473f65eeea7031cfdc3
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/53953
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=b:161951062
BRANCH=none
TEST=builds, reading /dev/mtd0 on Oak succeeds
Change-Id: I5ce6900e4892ed5687cfddb245dfe5461a3e2e84
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/53947
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We open the device node for the MTD device with this:
dev_fp = fopen(dev_path, "r+")
In C fopen() is allowed to provide _buffered_ access to the file.
That means that the standard library is allowed to read ahead and/or
return cached data. That's really not what we want for something like
this. Let's turn it off.
This fixes a problem where flashrom would sometimes fail to "verify"
that it erased the flash. The error message would look something like
this:
Erasing and writing flash chip... FAILED at 0x0000e220! Expected=0xff, Found=0xe9, failed byte count from 0x0000e200-0x0000e2ff: 0xdc
failed byte count from 0x0000e000-0x0000efff: 0xffffffff
ERASE_FAILED
FAILED!
Uh oh. Erase/write failed. Checking if anything changed.
After the failure I could read the flash device with a new invocation
of flashrom and I would see that, indeed, the erase had worked.
Tracing in the kernel showed that when the failure happened we saw a
pattern that looked like this:
* Read 0x0b00 bytes starting at 0x0000d000
* Read 0x1000 bytes starting at 0x0000db00
* Erase 0x1000 bytes starting at 0x0000e000
...and then there was _not_ a read after the erase. It can be assumed
that, since userspace had already read 0xdb00 - 0xeaff that it was
looking at old buffered data after the erase.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I989afd83a33013b2756a0090d6b08245613215c6
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/50155
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
extract_programmer_param() stores allocated memory in param, so make
sure it is freed at the end of the function.
Change-Id: I363e66b49c1ed4034ac058b94a938c8bb197e048
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Found-by: Coverity CID 1403823
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/34847
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This checks that the MTD sysfs node we will use actually exists prior
to calling setup code. Although the setup code will eventually catch
such an error, we need to think about the use case before printing a
possibly irrelevant/confusing error message to the terminal.
This patch makes it so that we only print an error message if the
user specifies a non-existent MTD device. Otherwise, the failure is
considered benign and we only print a debug message prior to bailing
out.
Change-Id: I8dc965eecc68cd305a989016869c688fe1a3921f
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendricks@fb.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26500
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
This imports a series of patches from chromiumos for MTD support.
The patches are squashed to ease review and original Change-Ids have
been removed to avoid confusing Gerrit.
There are a few changes to integrate the code:
- Conflict resolution
- Makefile changes
- Remove file library usage from linux_mtd. We may revisit this and use
it for other Linux interfaces later on.
- Switch to using file stream functions for reads and writes.
This consolidated patch is
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendricks@fb.com>
The first commit's message is:
Initial MTD support
This adds MTD support to flashrom so that we can read, erase, and
write content on a NOR flash chip via MTD.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:40208
BRANCH=none
TEST=read, write, and erase works on Oak
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/272983
Reviewed-by: Shawn N <shawnn@chromium.org>
This is the 2nd commit message:
linux_mtd: Fix compilation errors
This fixes compilation errors from the initial import patch.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendricks@fb.com>
This is the 3rd commit message:
linux_mtd: Suppress message if NOR device not found
This just suppresses a message that might cause confusion for
unsuspecting users.
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=ran on veyron_mickey, "NOR type device not found" message
no longer appears under normal circumstances.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/302145
Commit-Ready: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn N <shawnn@chromium.org>
This is the 4th commit message:
linux_mtd: Support for NO_ERASE type devices
Some mtd devices have the MTD_NO_ERASE flag set. This means
these devices don't require an erase to write and might not have
implemented an erase function. We should be conservative and skip
erasing altogether, falling back to performing writes over the whole
flash.
BUG=b:35104688
TESTED=Zaius flash is now written correctly for the 0xff regions.
Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <wak@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472128
Commit-Ready: William Kennington <wak@google.com>
Tested-by: William Kennington <wak@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
This is the 5th commit message:
linux_mtd: do reads in eraseblock-sized chunks
It's probably not the best idea to try to do an 8MB read in one syscall.
Theoretically, this should work; but MTD just relies on the SPI driver
to deliver the whole read in one transfer, and many SPI drivers haven't
been tested well with large transfer sizes.
I'd consider this a workaround, but it's still good to have IMO.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:53215
TEST=boot kevin; `flashrom --read ...`
TEST=check for performance regression on oak
BRANCH=none
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/344006
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
This is the 6th commit message:
linux_mtd: make read/write loop chunks consistent, and documented
Theoretically, there should be no maximum size for the read() and
write() syscalls on an MTD (well, except for the size of the entire
device). But practical concerns (i.e., bugs) have meant we don't quite
do this.
For reads:
Bug https://b/35573113 shows that some SPI-based MTD drivers don't yet
handle very large transactions. So we artificially limit this to
block-sized chunks.
For writes:
It's not clear there is a hard limit. Some drivers will already split
large writes into smaller chunks automatically. Others don't do any
splitting. At any rate, using *small* chunks can actually be a problem
for some devices (b:35104688), as they get worse performance (doing an
internal read/modify/write). This could be fixed in other ways by
advertizing their true "write chunk size" to user space somehow, but
this isn't so easy.
As a simpler fix, we can just increase the loop increment to match the
read loop. Per David, the original implementation (looping over page
chunks) was just being paranoid.
So this patch:
* clarifies comments in linux_mtd_read(), to note that the chunking is
somewhat of a hack that ideally can be fixed (with bug reference)
* simplifies the linux_mtd_write() looping to match the structure in
linux_mtd_read(), including dropping several unnecessary seeks, and
correcting the error messages (they referred to "reads" and had the
wrong parameters)
* change linux_mtd_write() to align its chunks to eraseblocks, not page
sizes
Note that the "->page_size" parameter is still somewhat ill-defined, and
only set by the upper layers for "opaque" flash. And it's not actually
used in this driver now. If we could figure out what we really want to
use it for, then we could try to set it appropriately.
BRANCH=none
BUG=b:35104688
TEST=various flashrom tests on Kevin
TEST=Reading and writing to flash works on our zaius machines over mtd
Change-Id: I3d6bb282863a5cf69909e28a1fc752b35f1b9599
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/505409
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: William Kennington <wak@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25706
Tested-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|