| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Corresponding to flashrom svn r739.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Corresponding to flashrom svn r723.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I decided to fill in the info for a
few chips to illustrate how this works both for uniform and non-uniform
sector sizes.
struct eraseblock{
int size; /* Eraseblock size */
int count; /* Number of contiguous blocks with that size */
};
struct eraseblock doesn't correspond with a single erase block, but with
a group of contiguous erase blocks having the same size.
Given a (top boot block) flash chip with the following weird, but
real-life structure:
top
16384
8192
8192
32768
65536
65536
65536
65536
65536
65536
65536
bottom
we get the following encoding:
{65536,7},{32768,1},{8192,2},{16384,1}
Although the number of blocks is bigger than 4, the number of block
groups is only 4. If you ever add some flash chips with more than 4
contiguous block groups, the definition will not fit into the 4-member
array anymore and gcc will recognize that and error out. No undetected
overflow possible. In that case, you simply increase array size a bit.
For modern flash chips with uniform erase block size, you only need one
array member anyway.
Of course data types will need to be changed if you ever get flash chips
with more than 2^30 erase blocks, but even with the lowest known erase
granularity of 256 bytes, these flash chips will have to have a size of
a quarter Terabyte. I'm pretty confident we won't see such big EEPROMs
in the near future (or at least not attached in a way that makes
flashrom usable). For SPI chips, we even have a guaranteed safety factor
of 4096 over the maximum SPI chip size (which is 2^24). And if such a
big flash chip has uniform erase block size, you could even split it
among the 4 array members. If you change int count to unsigned int
count, the storable size doubles. So with a split and a slight change of
data type, the maximum ROM chip size is 2 Terabytes.
Since many chips have multiple block erase functions where the
eraseblock layout depends on the block erase function, this patch
couples the block erase functions with their eraseblock layouts.
struct block_eraser {
struct eraseblock{
unsigned int size; /* Eraseblock size */
unsigned int count; /* Number of contiguous blocks with that size */
} eraseblocks[NUM_ERASEREGIONS];
int (*block_erase) (struct flashchip *flash, unsigned int blockaddr, unsigned int blocklen);
} block_erasers[NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS];
Corresponding to flashrom svn r719.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some SPI chip drivers and the generic 1-byte SPI chip write functions
didn't include the automatic erase present in other chip drivers.
Since the majority is definitely auto-erase, change the remaining
explicit-erase cases to be auto-erase as well.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r673.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carlos Arnau Perez <cemede@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Serprog compilation is now controlled by a Makefile variable.
Replace munmap with physunmap where appropriate.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r671.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we only send an opcode and no additional data/address, the SPI
controller will read one byte too few from the chip. Basically, the
last byte of the chip response is discarded and will not end up in the
FIFO. It is unclear if the CS# line is set high too early as well. That
hardware bug is undocumented as of now, but I'm working with AMD to add
a detailed description of it to the errata.
Add loads of additional debugging to SB600/SB700 init.
Add explanatory comments for unintuitive code flow.
Thanks go to Uwe for testing quite a few iterations of the patch.
Kill the SB600 flash chip status register special case, which was a
somewhat misguided workaround for that hardware erratum.
Note for future added features in the SB600 SPI driver: It may be
possible to read up to 15 bytes of command response with overlapping
reads due to the ring buffer design of the FIFO if the command can be
repeated without ill effects. Same for skipping up to 7 bytes between
command and response.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r661.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some drivers support only a few combinations of read/write length and
return error otherwise. Having a distinct return code for this error
means we can handle it in upper layers.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r653.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r651.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested it on Epia-m700 worked okay.
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some SPI opcodes need to be sent in direct succession after each other
without any chip deselect happening in between. A prominent example is
WREN (Write Enable) directly before PP (Page Program). Intel calls the
first opcode in such a row "preopcode".
Right now, we ignore the direct succession requirement completely and it
works pretty well because most onboard SPI masters have a timing or
heuristics which make the problem disappear.
The FT2232 SPI flasher is different. Since it is an external flasher,
timing is very different to what we can expect from onboard flashers and
this leads to failure at slow speeds.
This patch allows any function to submit multiple SPI commands in a
stream to any flasher. Support in the individual flashers isn't
implemented yet, so there is one generic function which passes the each
command in the stream one-by-one to the command functions of the
selected SPI flash driver.
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
Corresponding to flashrom svn r645.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make a few local functions in sb600spi.c static.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r623.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen <libv@skynet.be>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That means you can tell flashrom to read exactly bytes 12345-56789
(start 12345, length 44445) and it will not fetch a single byte more.
Uwe tested this on one LPC, one SPI, and one parallel flash board.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r596.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And even when it checks if the erase worked, the result of that check is
often ignored.
Convert all erase functions and actually check return codes
almost everywhere.
Check inside all erase_* routines if erase worked, not outside.
erase_sector_jedec and erase_block_jedec have changed prototypes to
enable erase checking.
Uwe successfully tested LPC on an CK804 box and SPI on some SB600 box.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r595.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was partly due to a design problem in the abstraction layer.
There should be exactly two different functions for reading SPI chips:
- memory mapped reads
- SPI command reads.
Each of them should be contained in a separate function, optionally
taking parameters where needed.
This patch solves the problems mentioned above, shortens the code and
makes the code logic a lot more obvious.
Since open-coding the min() function leads to errors, include it in this
patch as well.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r589.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Right now, the annotation only differentiates between SPI and non-SPI.
Anyone who knows more about a specific flash chip should feel free to
update it.
The existing flashbus variable was abused to denote the SPI controller
type. Use an aptly named variable for that purpose.
Once this patch is merged, the chipset/programmer init functions can set
supported flash chip types and flashrom can automatically select only
matching probe/read/erase/write functions. A side benefit of that will
be the elimination of the Winbond W29EE011 vs. AMIC A49LF040A conflict.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r556.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some MMIO accesses used volatile, others didn't (and risked
non-execution of side effects) and even with volatile, some accesses
looked dubious.
Since the MMIO accessor functions and the onboard flash accessor
functions are functionally identical (but have different signatures),
make the flash accessors wrappers for the MMIO accessors.
For some of the conversions, I used Coccinelle. Semantic patch follows:
@@ typedef uint8_t; expression a; volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - b[a] + *(b
+ a) @@ expression a; volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - *(b) |= (a); + *(b) =
*(b) | (a); @@ expression a; volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - *(b) = (a); +
mmio_writeb(a, b); @@ volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - *(b) + mmio_readb(b) @@
type T; T b; @@ ( mmio_readb | mmio_writeb ) (..., - (T) - (b) + b )
Corresponding to flashrom svn r524.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Uwe tested read, write, erase with this patch on a random board to make
sure nothing breaks.
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Build-tested on 32bit x86.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r521.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AAI mode
Change SPI architecture to handle 1-byte chunk chip writing differently
from 256-byte chunk chip writing.
Annotate SPI chip write functions with _256 or _1 suffix denoting the
number of bytes they write at maximum.
The 1-byte chunk writing is cut-n-pasted to different SPI drivers right
now. A later patch can move them to the generic spi_chip_write_1.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r485.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Until the ICH SPI driver can handle preopcodes as standalone opcodes,
we should handle such special opcode failure gracefully on ICH and
compatible chipsets.
This fixes chip erase on almost all ICH+VIA SPI masters.
Thanks to Ali Nadalizadeh for helping track down this bug!
Corresponding to flashrom svn r484.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add missing copyright year.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r428 and coreboot v2 svn r4107.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Corresponding to flashrom svn r354 and coreboot v2 svn r3782.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe, Bao <Zheng.Bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
|
|
|
This has been tested by Uwe Hermann on an RS690/SB600 board.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r351 and coreboot v2 svn r3779.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
|
