aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/writeprotect.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* writeprotect: Add some debug logging if wp_verify failsEvan Benn2022-10-311-3/+8
| | | | | | | | | | Change-Id: I5fcaf767570418f90ae44826a1135d9b49653033 Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67720 Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* tree/: Convert flashchip decode range func ptr to enumNikolai Artemiev2022-10-281-2/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Replace the `decode_range` function pointer in `struct flashchip` to an enum value. The enum value can be used to find the corresponding function pointer by passing it to `lookup_decode_range_func_ptr()`. Removing function pointers like `decode_range` makes it possible to represent chip data in a declarative format that does not have to be stored as C source code. BUG=b:242479049 BRANCH=none TEST=ninja && ninja test Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Change-Id: If6d08d414d3d1ddadc95ca1d407fc87c23ab543d Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/67195 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* writeprotect.c: Allow opaque masters to hook {read,write}_register()Edward O'Callaghan2022-06-211-4/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow specialisation in opaque masters, such as ichspi hwseq, to write to status registers. Also update the dispatch logic in libflashrom to call wp code when status register access functions are provided by an opaque master. BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-status on AMD and Intel DUTs Change-Id: I3ab0d7f5f48338c8ecb118a69651c203fbc516ac Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Co-Authored-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64375 Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* writeprotect: Add line-break after each `spew` messageNico Huber2022-06-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Change-Id: I3131ff0e3fa4f9e949ce2e8d2d0a9c862a15e1cd Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64745 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
* libflashrom: Move documentation to headerEvan Benn2022-05-061-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The doxygen documentation was in the libflashrom.c file. Move the documentation to the libflashrom.h file. This allows foreign function interface binding generators (eg rust bindgen) that operate on the .h file to generate documentation for the target language. Some doxygen errors were also corrected, mostly undocumented or wrongly labeled parameters. To test, I have diffed and inspected the doxygen documentation before and after the change. All functions are documented the same, and the structs and enums are now also included in the docs. Change-Id: I856b74d5bfea13722539be15496755a95e701eea Signed-off-by: Evan Benn <evanbenn@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/63903 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
* writeprotect: add WPS bit and always set it to zeroSergii Dmytruk2022-04-291-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | WPS bit controls use of individual block protection which is mutually exclusive with protection based on ranges. Proper support requires extension of the API as well as implementation, so here we're just making sure that range-based protection is enabled and our WP configuration is not ignored by the chip. Change-Id: I2c26ec65d64a3b6fb1f1a73690bc771415db2744 Signed-off-by: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/60231 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
* writeprotect.c: refactor and fix wp_mode functionsNikolai Artemiev2022-04-051-10/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a follow up on commit 12dbc4e04508aecfff53ad95b6f68865da1b4f07. Use a lookup table in get_wp_mode() and drop the srp_bit_present check, since a chip without SRP is just FLASHROM_WP_MODE_DISABLED. Add a srp_bit_present check to set_wp_mode() if the mode requires it. BUG=b:182223106 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-{enable,disable,status} on AMD dut Change-Id: Ib6c347453f9216e5816e4ed35bf9783fd3c720e0 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62643 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* writeprotect: add {get,set}_wp_mode()Nikolai Artemiev2022-03-011-6/+44
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BUG=b:195381327,b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-{enable,disable,status} Change-Id: I7b68e940f0e1359281806c98e1da119b4caf8405 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58483 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
* writeprotect: add set_wp_range()Nikolai Artemiev2022-03-011-3/+34
| | | | | | | | | | | | BUG=b:195381327,b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-{status,range} Change-Id: I7d26f43fb05c5828b9839bb57a28fa1088dcd9a0 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58482 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* libflashrom,writeprotect: add flashrom_wp_get_available_ranges()Nikolai Artemiev2022-03-011-0/+193
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Generate list of available ranges by enumerating all possible values that range bits (BPx, TB, ...) can take and using the chip's range decoding function to get the range that is selected by each one. BUG=b:195381327,b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-list Change-Id: Id51f038f03305c8536d80313e52f77d27835f34d Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58481 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* writeprotect: add get_wp_range() for decoding rangesNikolai Artemiev2022-03-011-3/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | BUG=b:195381327,b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-{status,range} at end of patch series Change-Id: I5a1dfcf384166b1bac319d286306747e1dcaa000 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/59183 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* libflashrom,writeprotect: add functions for reading/writing WP configsNikolai Artemiev2022-03-011-0/+188
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | New functions are exposed through the libflashrom API for reading/writing chip's WP settins: `flashrom_wp_{read,write}_cfg()`. They read/write an opaque `struct flashrom_wp_cfg` instance, which includes the flash protection range and status register protection mode. This commit also adds `{read,write}_wp_bits()` helper functions that read/write chip-specific WP configuration bits. BUG=b:195381327,b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom --wp-{enable,disable,range,list,status} at end of patch series Change-Id: I3ad25708c3321b8fb0216c3eaf6ffc07616537ad Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58479 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
* writeprotect, cli_classic: delete old writeprotect codeNikolai Artemiev2022-02-281-371/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Delete writeprotect code that was previously extracted from the cros tree. This is the first of a series of commits adding writeprotect support. Following commits incrementally implement writeprotect operations, culminating in writeprotect support for three example chips: GD25LQ128, GD25Q32, and GD25Q256. BUG=b:195381327,b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=flashrom -{r,w,E} TEST=flashrom --wp-{enable,disable,range,list,status} at end of patch series Change-Id: I67e9b31f86465e5a8f7d3def637198671ee818a8 Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58474 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
* Add writeprotect support infrastructureEdward O'Callaghan2020-09-281-0/+394
The following just lays out the structure for write protect manipulation of SPI flash chips in Flashrom. We later follow up with adding support for each manufacturer group. BUG=b:153800563 BRANCH=none TEST=builds Change-Id: Id93b5a1cb2da476fa8a7dde41d7b963024117474 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/40325 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-17 16:04:50 +0000