From 439597032eae0f41745d9173805945c5c85475eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Uwe Hermann Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:28:29 +0000 Subject: Various coding style and cosmetic changes - Fix coding-style, whitespace, and indentation in a few places. - Consistently use the same spelling ("Super I/O") everywhere. Corresponding to flashrom svn r933. - Make some flashrom stdout output look a bit nicer. Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann Acked-by: Uwe Hermann --- flashrom.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'flashrom.c') diff --git a/flashrom.c b/flashrom.c index 6a910891..988e0102 100644 --- a/flashrom.c +++ b/flashrom.c @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ int need_erase(uint8_t *have, uint8_t *want, int len, enum write_granularity gra case write_gran_256bytes: for (j = 0; j < len / 256; j++) { limit = min (256, len - j * 256); - /* Are have and want identical? */ + /* Are 'have' and 'want' identical? */ if (!memcmp(have + j * 256, want + j * 256, limit)) continue; /* have needs to be in erased state. */ @@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int selfcheck_eraseblocks(struct flashchip *flash) * layouts. That would imply "magic" erase functions. The * easiest way to check this is with function pointers. */ - for (j = k + 1; j < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; j++) + for (j = k + 1; j < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; j++) { if (eraser.block_erase == flash->block_erasers[j].block_erase) { msg_gerr("ERROR: Flash chip %s erase function " @@ -1037,6 +1037,7 @@ int selfcheck_eraseblocks(struct flashchip *flash) flash->name, k, j); ret = 1; } + } } return ret; } @@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ void check_chip_supported(struct flashchip *flash) "this flash part. Please include the flashrom\noutput " "with the additional -V option for all operations you " "tested (-V, -rV,\n-wV, -EV), and mention which " - "mainboard or programmer you tested. Thanks for your " + "mainboard or programmer you tested.\nThanks for your " "help!\n===\n"); } } -- cgit v1.2.3