1 files changed, 34 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/classes.rst b/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/classes.rst
index f3610ef3..c0c53135 100644
--- a/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/classes.rst
+++ b/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/classes.rst
@@ -44,14 +44,14 @@ interactive Python session demonstrating this example is shown below:
 
     % python
     >>> import example
-    >>> p = example.Pet('Molly')
+    >>> p = example.Pet("Molly")
     >>> print(p)
     <example.Pet object at 0x10cd98060>
     >>> p.getName()
-    u'Molly'
-    >>> p.setName('Charly')
+    'Molly'
+    >>> p.setName("Charly")
     >>> p.getName()
-    u'Charly'
+    'Charly'
 
 .. seealso::
 
@@ -122,12 +122,12 @@ This makes it possible to write
 
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
-    >>> p = example.Pet('Molly')
+    >>> p = example.Pet("Molly")
     >>> p.name
-    u'Molly'
-    >>> p.name = 'Charly'
+    'Molly'
+    >>> p.name = "Charly"
     >>> p.name
-    u'Charly'
+    'Charly'
 
 Now suppose that ``Pet::name`` was a private internal variable
 that can only be accessed via setters and getters.
@@ -174,10 +174,10 @@ Native Python classes can pick up new attributes dynamically:
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
     >>> class Pet:
-    ...     name = 'Molly'
+    ...     name = "Molly"
     ...
     >>> p = Pet()
-    >>> p.name = 'Charly'  # overwrite existing
+    >>> p.name = "Charly"  # overwrite existing
     >>> p.age = 2  # dynamically add a new attribute
 
 By default, classes exported from C++ do not support this and the only writable
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ Trying to set any other attribute results in an error:
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
     >>> p = example.Pet()
-    >>> p.name = 'Charly'  # OK, attribute defined in C++
+    >>> p.name = "Charly"  # OK, attribute defined in C++
     >>> p.age = 2  # fail
     AttributeError: 'Pet' object has no attribute 'age'
 
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ Now everything works as expected:
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
     >>> p = example.Pet()
-    >>> p.name = 'Charly'  # OK, overwrite value in C++
+    >>> p.name = "Charly"  # OK, overwrite value in C++
     >>> p.age = 2  # OK, dynamically add a new attribute
     >>> p.__dict__  # just like a native Python class
     {'age': 2}
@@ -280,11 +280,11 @@ expose fields and methods of both types:
 
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
-    >>> p = example.Dog('Molly')
+    >>> p = example.Dog("Molly")
     >>> p.name
-    u'Molly'
+    'Molly'
     >>> p.bark()
-    u'woof!'
+    'woof!'
 
 The C++ classes defined above are regular non-polymorphic types with an
 inheritance relationship. This is reflected in Python:
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ will automatically recognize this:
     >>> type(p)
     PolymorphicDog  # automatically downcast
     >>> p.bark()
-    u'woof!'
+    'woof!'
 
 Given a pointer to a polymorphic base, pybind11 performs automatic downcasting
 to the actual derived type. Note that this goes beyond the usual situation in
@@ -434,8 +434,7 @@ you can use ``py::detail::overload_cast_impl`` with an additional set of parenth
         .def("set", overload_cast_<int>()(&Pet::set), "Set the pet's age")
         .def("set", overload_cast_<const std::string &>()(&Pet::set), "Set the pet's name");
 
-.. [#cpp14] A compiler which supports the ``-std=c++14`` flag
-            or Visual Studio 2015 Update 2 and newer.
+.. [#cpp14] A compiler which supports the ``-std=c++14`` flag.
 
 .. note::
 
@@ -446,8 +445,7 @@ you can use ``py::detail::overload_cast_impl`` with an additional set of parenth
 Enumerations and internal types
 ===============================
 
-Let's now suppose that the example class contains an internal enumeration type,
-e.g.:
+Let's now suppose that the example class contains internal types like enumerations, e.g.:
 
 .. code-block:: cpp
 
@@ -457,10 +455,15 @@ e.g.:
             Cat
         };
 
+        struct Attributes {
+            float age = 0;
+        };
+
         Pet(const std::string &name, Kind type) : name(name), type(type) { }
 
         std::string name;
         Kind type;
+        Attributes attr;
     };
 
 The binding code for this example looks as follows:
@@ -471,22 +474,28 @@ The binding code for this example looks as follows:
 
     pet.def(py::init<const std::string &, Pet::Kind>())
         .def_readwrite("name", &Pet::name)
-        .def_readwrite("type", &Pet::type);
+        .def_readwrite("type", &Pet::type)
+        .def_readwrite("attr", &Pet::attr);
 
     py::enum_<Pet::Kind>(pet, "Kind")
         .value("Dog", Pet::Kind::Dog)
         .value("Cat", Pet::Kind::Cat)
         .export_values();
 
-To ensure that the ``Kind`` type is created within the scope of ``Pet``, the
-``pet`` :class:`class_` instance must be supplied to the :class:`enum_`.
+    py::class_<Pet::Attributes>(pet, "Attributes")
+        .def(py::init<>())
+        .def_readwrite("age", &Pet::Attributes::age);
+
+
+To ensure that the nested types ``Kind`` and ``Attributes`` are created within the scope of ``Pet``, the
+``pet`` :class:`class_` instance must be supplied to the :class:`enum_` and :class:`class_`
 constructor. The :func:`enum_::export_values` function exports the enum entries
 into the parent scope, which should be skipped for newer C++11-style strongly
 typed enums.
 
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
-    >>> p = Pet('Lucy', Pet.Cat)
+    >>> p = Pet("Lucy", Pet.Cat)
     >>> p.type
     Kind.Cat
     >>> int(p.type)
@@ -508,7 +517,7 @@ The ``name`` property returns the name of the enum value as a unicode string.
 
     .. code-block:: pycon
 
-        >>> p = Pet( "Lucy", Pet.Cat )
+        >>> p = Pet("Lucy", Pet.Cat)
         >>> pet_type = p.type
         >>> pet_type
         Pet.Cat