diff options
author | Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> | 2016-09-10 14:54:26 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com> | 2016-09-10 14:54:26 +0200 |
commit | 2b1c6b21b5e6c82ebb55d7fb7df90e60e88cbb14 (patch) | |
tree | ba6d48b4fec219d07110f5d55afc19bc309d2bdb /target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch | |
parent | ac08cb06f6734ebf73ed855cbc836c566f80eaca (diff) | |
download | master-31e0f0ae-2b1c6b21b5e6c82ebb55d7fb7df90e60e88cbb14.tar.gz master-31e0f0ae-2b1c6b21b5e6c82ebb55d7fb7df90e60e88cbb14.tar.bz2 master-31e0f0ae-2b1c6b21b5e6c82ebb55d7fb7df90e60e88cbb14.zip |
brcm2708: update linux 4.4 patches to latest version
As usual these patches were extracted and rebased from the raspberry pi repo:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/tree/rpi-4.4.y
Also adds support for Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3 (untested).
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch index 8292103ff5..4a29fc15ec 100644 --- a/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch +++ b/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0094-drm-vc4-Use-job_lock-to-protect-seqno_cb_list.patch @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -From 616e0a78750f2c92c52ac7f6638a8f5a901afdaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 454b9dabe51753598732a2d91f742abdd82f3b18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:32:24 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH 094/423] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list. +Subject: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Use job_lock to protect seqno_cb_list. We're (mostly) not supposed to be using struct_mutex in drivers these days. |