From fac7f7f84f3771c5247c7fdee825c092077984f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mirko Vogt Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:58:53 +0000 Subject: changed Makefile and profiles, added patches for kernel 2.6.24 (stable-branch of Openmoko) git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@13613 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73 --- .../1020-i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch.patch | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1020-i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch.patch (limited to 'target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1020-i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch.patch') diff --git a/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1020-i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch.patch b/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1020-i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..dd568dedbc --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.24/1020-i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch.patch @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +From ae0e6a5c9e4cc1786c8b798ac19259a339476121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: mokopatches +Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:32:41 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] i2c-permit_invalid_addrs.patch + We need this stupid workaround since our amplifier chip uses a 'reserved' I2C + address + +Signed-off-by: Harald Welte +--- + drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 4 ++-- + 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +index b5e13e4..2c802de 100644 +--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c ++++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +@@ -941,11 +941,11 @@ static int i2c_probe_address(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int addr, int kind, + int err; + + /* Make sure the address is valid */ +- if (addr < 0x03 || addr > 0x77) { ++ /*if (addr < 0x03 || addr > 0x77) { + dev_warn(&adapter->dev, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n", + addr); + return -EINVAL; +- } ++ }*/ + + /* Skip if already in use */ + if (i2c_check_addr(adapter, addr)) +-- +1.5.6.5 + -- cgit v1.2.3