aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorÁlvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>2021-08-21 10:54:34 +0200
committerÁlvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>2021-08-21 19:07:07 +0200
commit8299d1f057439f94c6a4412e2e5c5082b82a30c9 (patch)
tree1bf678d61f11f7394493be464c7876e496f7faed /target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch
parent33b6885975ce376ff075362b7f0890326043111b (diff)
downloadupstream-8299d1f057439f94c6a4412e2e5c5082b82a30c9.tar.gz
upstream-8299d1f057439f94c6a4412e2e5c5082b82a30c9.tar.bz2
upstream-8299d1f057439f94c6a4412e2e5c5082b82a30c9.zip
bcm27xx: add kernel 5.10 support
Rebased RPi foundation patches on linux 5.10.59, removed applied and reverted patches, wireless patches and defconfig patches. bcm2708: boot tested on RPi B+ v1.2 bcm2709: boot tested on RPi 4B v1.1 4G bcm2711: boot tested on RPi 4B v1.1 4G Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch32
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch b/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5b5e71b250
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.10/950-0472-gpio-fsm-Rename-num-soft-gpios-to-avoid-warning.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+From f55b35f2dbd1ab60fe8d59c56ae1cbad2f3e67ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
+Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:25:35 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] gpio-fsm: Rename 'num-soft-gpios' to avoid warning
+
+As of 5.10, the Device Tree parser warns about properties that look
+like references to "suppliers" of various services. "num-soft-gpios"
+resembles a declaration of a GPIO called "num-soft", causing the value
+to be interpreted as a phandle, the owner of which is checked for a
+"#gpio-cells" property.
+
+To avoid this warning, rename the gpio-fsm property to "num-swgpios".
+
+Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
+---
+ drivers/gpio/gpio-fsm.c | 5 +++--
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-fsm.c
++++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-fsm.c
+@@ -866,8 +866,9 @@ static int gpio_fsm_probe(struct platfor
+ [SYM_SHUTDOWN] = "shutdown_state",
+ };
+
+- if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-soft-gpios", &num_soft_gpios)) {
+- dev_err(dev, "missing 'num-soft-gpios' property\n");
++ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-swgpios", &num_soft_gpios) &&
++ of_property_read_u32(np, "num-soft-gpios", &num_soft_gpios)) {
++ dev_err(dev, "missing 'num-swgpios' property\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+