openwrt/upstream - upstream openwrt

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	treewide: clean up download hashes	Felix Fietkau	2016-12-16	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Replace MD5SUM with HASH, replace MD5 hashes with SHA256 Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
*	package/libs/libconfig: Update to 1.5	Daniel Engberg	2016-10-15	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Update libconfig to 1.5 Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
*	treewide: replace nbd@openwrt.org with nbd@nbd.name	Felix Fietkau	2016-06-07	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
*	license info - revert r43155	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-3/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info. Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 43167
*	Add more license tags with SPDX identifiers	John Crispin	2014-11-03	1	-0/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied together - each with different licensing information in the file headers. I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information and/or did not miss license information. Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de> SVN-Revision: 43155
*	Add a few SPDX tags	Steven Barth	2014-11-02	1	-0/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org> SVN-Revision: 43151
*	libconfig: add from /packages, update to latest version, add myself as ↵	Felix Fietkau	2013-07-26	1	-0/+58
	maintainer Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 37552