| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 45936
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 45770
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 45689
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 45590
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 44246
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 43961
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 43946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info.
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 43167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 43151
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 42741
|
|
|
|
| |
SVN-Revision: 41003
|
|
SVN-Revision: 40823
|