From 9e1530b2a35e051664ed243efd1eac942883494a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stijn Segers Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 18:08:25 +0200 Subject: kernel: bump 4.9 to 4.9.117 for 18.06 * Refreshed patches. * Removed patches: - target/linux/ar71xx/patches-4.9/103-MIPS-ath79-fix-register-address-in-ath79_ddr_wb_flus.patch superseded by upstream - target/linux/ar71xx/patches-4.9/403-mtd_fix_cfi_cmdset_0002_status_check.patch superseded by upstream - target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.9/001-4.11-01-mtd-m25p80-consider-max-message-size-in-m25p80_read.patch accepted upstream - target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.9/001-4.15-08-bcm63xx_enet-correct-clock-usage.patch accepted upstream - target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.9/001-4.15-09-bcm63xx_enet-do-not-write-to-random-DMA-channel-on-B.patch accepted upstream - target/linux/generic/pending-4.9/900-gen_stats-fix-netlink-stats-padding.patch * New backported patch to address ext4 breakage, introduced in 4.9.112: - backport-4.9/500-ext4-fix-check-to-prevent-initializing-reserved-inod.patch Also add ARM64_SSBD symbol to ARM64 targets still running kernel 4.9 Thanks to Koen Vandeputte for pointing out the need to add the ARM64_SSBD symbol, and the ext4 patch. Compile-tested on: ar71xx Run-tested on: ar71xx Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers --- target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'target/linux/brcm47xx') diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch index df9d434c9f..58d8500b05 100644 --- a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch +++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.9/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- a/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c -@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_ +@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_ int trx_num = 0; /* Number of found TRX partitions */ int possible_nvram_sizes[] = { 0x8000, 0xF000, 0x10000, }; int err; @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ /* * Some really old flashes (like AT45DB*) had smaller erasesize-s, but -@@ -283,12 +284,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_ +@@ -284,12 +285,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_ if (buf[0] == NVRAM_HEADER) { bcm47xxpart_add_part(&parts[curr_part++], "nvram", master->size - blocksize, 0); -- cgit v1.2.3