Add pybind11 2.5 source

1 files changed, 240 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/advanced/cast/stl.rst b/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/advanced/cast/stl.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e48409f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3rdparty/pybind11/docs/advanced/cast/stl.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+STL containers
+##############
+
+Automatic conversion
+====================
+
+When including the additional header file :file:`pybind11/stl.h`, conversions
+between ``std::vector<>``/``std::deque<>``/``std::list<>``/``std::array<>``,
+``std::set<>``/``std::unordered_set<>``, and
+``std::map<>``/``std::unordered_map<>`` and the Python ``list``, ``set`` and
+``dict`` data structures are automatically enabled. The types ``std::pair<>``
+and ``std::tuple<>`` are already supported out of the box with just the core
+:file:`pybind11/pybind11.h` header.
+
+The major downside of these implicit conversions is that containers must be
+converted (i.e. copied) on every Python->C++ and C++->Python transition, which
+can have implications on the program semantics and performance. Please read the
+next sections for more details and alternative approaches that avoid this.
+
+.. note::
+
+    Arbitrary nesting of any of these types is possible.
+
+.. seealso::
+
+    The file :file:`tests/test_stl.cpp` contains a complete
+    example that demonstrates how to pass STL data types in more detail.
+
+.. _cpp17_container_casters:
+
+C++17 library containers
+========================
+
+The :file:`pybind11/stl.h` header also includes support for ``std::optional<>``
+and ``std::variant<>``. These require a C++17 compiler and standard library.
+In C++14 mode, ``std::experimental::optional<>`` is supported if available.
+
+Various versions of these containers also exist for C++11 (e.g. in Boost).
+pybind11 provides an easy way to specialize the ``type_caster`` for such
+types:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    // `boost::optional` as an example -- can be any `std::optional`-like container
+    namespace pybind11 { namespace detail {
+        template <typename T>
+        struct type_caster<boost::optional<T>> : optional_caster<boost::optional<T>> {};
+    }}
+
+The above should be placed in a header file and included in all translation units
+where automatic conversion is needed. Similarly, a specialization can be provided
+for custom variant types:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    // `boost::variant` as an example -- can be any `std::variant`-like container
+    namespace pybind11 { namespace detail {
+        template <typename... Ts>
+        struct type_caster<boost::variant<Ts...>> : variant_caster<boost::variant<Ts...>> {};
+
+        // Specifies the function used to visit the variant -- `apply_visitor` instead of `visit`
+        template <>
+        struct visit_helper<boost::variant> {
+            template <typename... Args>
+            static auto call(Args &&...args) -> decltype(boost::apply_visitor(args...)) {
+                return boost::apply_visitor(args...);
+            }
+        };
+    }} // namespace pybind11::detail
+
+The ``visit_helper`` specialization is not required if your ``name::variant`` provides
+a ``name::visit()`` function. For any other function name, the specialization must be
+included to tell pybind11 how to visit the variant.
+
+.. note::
+
+    pybind11 only supports the modern implementation of ``boost::variant``
+    which makes use of variadic templates. This requires Boost 1.56 or newer.
+    Additionally, on Windows, MSVC 2017 is required because ``boost::variant``
+    falls back to the old non-variadic implementation on MSVC 2015.
+
+.. _opaque:
+
+Making opaque types
+===================
+
+pybind11 heavily relies on a template matching mechanism to convert parameters
+and return values that are constructed from STL data types such as vectors,
+linked lists, hash tables, etc. This even works in a recursive manner, for
+instance to deal with lists of hash maps of pairs of elementary and custom
+types, etc.
+
+However, a fundamental limitation of this approach is that internal conversions
+between Python and C++ types involve a copy operation that prevents
+pass-by-reference semantics. What does this mean?
+
+Suppose we bind the following function
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    void append_1(std::vector<int> &v) {
+       v.push_back(1);
+    }
+
+and call it from Python, the following happens:
+
+.. code-block:: pycon
+
+   >>> v = [5, 6]
+   >>> append_1(v)
+   >>> print(v)
+   [5, 6]
+
+As you can see, when passing STL data structures by reference, modifications
+are not propagated back the Python side. A similar situation arises when
+exposing STL data structures using the ``def_readwrite`` or ``def_readonly``
+functions:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    /* ... definition ... */
+
+    class MyClass {
+        std::vector<int> contents;
+    };
+
+    /* ... binding code ... */
+
+    py::class_<MyClass>(m, "MyClass")
+        .def(py::init<>())
+        .def_readwrite("contents", &MyClass::contents);
+
+In this case, properties can be read and written in their entirety. However, an
+``append`` operation involving such a list type has no effect:
+
+.. code-block:: pycon
+
+   >>> m = MyClass()
+   >>> m.contents = [5, 6]
+   >>> print(m.contents)
+   [5, 6]
+   >>> m.contents.append(7)
+   >>> print(m.contents)
+   [5, 6]
+
+Finally, the involved copy operations can be costly when dealing with very
+large lists. To deal with all of the above situations, pybind11 provides a
+macro named ``PYBIND11_MAKE_OPAQUE(T)`` that disables the template-based
+conversion machinery of types, thus rendering them *opaque*. The contents of
+opaque objects are never inspected or extracted, hence they *can* be passed by
+reference. For instance, to turn ``std::vector<int>`` into an opaque type, add
+the declaration
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    PYBIND11_MAKE_OPAQUE(std::vector<int>);
+
+before any binding code (e.g. invocations to ``class_::def()``, etc.). This
+macro must be specified at the top level (and outside of any namespaces), since
+it instantiates a partial template overload. If your binding code consists of
+multiple compilation units, it must be present in every file (typically via a
+common header) preceding any usage of ``std::vector<int>``. Opaque types must
+also have a corresponding ``class_`` declaration to associate them with a name
+in Python, and to define a set of available operations, e.g.:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    py::class_<std::vector<int>>(m, "IntVector")
+        .def(py::init<>())
+        .def("clear", &std::vector<int>::clear)
+        .def("pop_back", &std::vector<int>::pop_back)
+        .def("__len__", [](const std::vector<int> &v) { return v.size(); })
+        .def("__iter__", [](std::vector<int> &v) {
+           return py::make_iterator(v.begin(), v.end());
+        }, py::keep_alive<0, 1>()) /* Keep vector alive while iterator is used */
+        // ....
+
+.. seealso::
+
+    The file :file:`tests/test_opaque_types.cpp` contains a complete
+    example that demonstrates how to create and expose opaque types using
+    pybind11 in more detail.
+
+.. _stl_bind:
+
+Binding STL containers
+======================
+
+The ability to expose STL containers as native Python objects is a fairly
+common request, hence pybind11 also provides an optional header file named
+:file:`pybind11/stl_bind.h` that does exactly this. The mapped containers try
+to match the behavior of their native Python counterparts as much as possible.
+
+The following example showcases usage of :file:`pybind11/stl_bind.h`:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    // Don't forget this
+    #include <pybind11/stl_bind.h>
+
+    PYBIND11_MAKE_OPAQUE(std::vector<int>);
+    PYBIND11_MAKE_OPAQUE(std::map<std::string, double>);
+
+    // ...
+
+    // later in binding code:
+    py::bind_vector<std::vector<int>>(m, "VectorInt");
+    py::bind_map<std::map<std::string, double>>(m, "MapStringDouble");
+
+When binding STL containers pybind11 considers the types of the container's
+elements to decide whether the container should be confined to the local module
+(via the :ref:`module_local` feature).  If the container element types are
+anything other than already-bound custom types bound without
+``py::module_local()`` the container binding will have ``py::module_local()``
+applied.  This includes converting types such as numeric types, strings, Eigen
+types; and types that have not yet been bound at the time of the stl container
+binding.  This module-local binding is designed to avoid potential conflicts
+between module bindings (for example, from two separate modules each attempting
+to bind ``std::vector<int>`` as a python type).
+
+It is possible to override this behavior to force a definition to be either
+module-local or global.  To do so, you can pass the attributes
+``py::module_local()`` (to make the binding module-local) or
+``py::module_local(false)`` (to make the binding global) into the
+``py::bind_vector`` or ``py::bind_map`` arguments:
+
+.. code-block:: cpp
+
+    py::bind_vector<std::vector<int>>(m, "VectorInt", py::module_local(false));
+
+Note, however, that such a global binding would make it impossible to load this
+module at the same time as any other pybind module that also attempts to bind
+the same container type (``std::vector<int>`` in the above example).
+
+See :ref:`module_local` for more details on module-local bindings.
+
+.. seealso::
+
+    The file :file:`tests/test_stl_binders.cpp` shows how to use the
+    convenience STL container wrappers.