diff options
author | Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org> | 2010-08-31 20:06:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org> | 2010-08-31 20:06:42 +0000 |
commit | 1efec5288555df8111dc4bb7766e5261a87d0323 (patch) | |
tree | bdcefc9d858bf0d7168f7b83bfb25fab886669df /target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34 | |
parent | 53b3a757118dcb188a0f57e68b05b164451c63cd (diff) | |
download | master-187ad058-1efec5288555df8111dc4bb7766e5261a87d0323.tar.gz master-187ad058-1efec5288555df8111dc4bb7766e5261a87d0323.tar.bz2 master-187ad058-1efec5288555df8111dc4bb7766e5261a87d0323.zip |
generic: bacport SPI bus locking API
git-svn-id: svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@22862 3c298f89-4303-0410-b956-a3cf2f4a3e73
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34')
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/910-backport-spi-bus-locking-api.patch | 382 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/911-backport-mmc_spi-use-spi-bus-locking-api.patch | 143 |
2 files changed, 525 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/910-backport-spi-bus-locking-api.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/910-backport-spi-bus-locking-api.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..dbf3e51b4d --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/910-backport-spi-bus-locking-api.patch @@ -0,0 +1,382 @@ +From cf32b71e981ca63e8f349d8585ca2a3583b556e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Ernst Schwab <eschwab@online.de> +Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:49:29 -0700 +Subject: [PATCH] spi/mmc_spi: SPI bus locking API, using mutex + +SPI bus locking API to allow exclusive access to the SPI bus, especially, but +not limited to, for the mmc_spi driver. + +Coded according to an outline from Grant Likely; here is his +specification (accidentally swapped function names corrected): + +It requires 3 things to be added to struct spi_master. +- 1 Mutex +- 1 spin lock +- 1 flag. + +The mutex protects spi_sync, and provides sleeping "for free" +The spinlock protects the atomic spi_async call. +The flag is set when the lock is obtained, and checked while holding +the spinlock in spi_async(). If the flag is checked, then spi_async() +must fail immediately. + +The current runtime API looks like this: +spi_async(struct spi_device*, struct spi_message*); +spi_sync(struct spi_device*, struct spi_message*); + +The API needs to be extended to this: +spi_async(struct spi_device*, struct spi_message*) +spi_sync(struct spi_device*, struct spi_message*) +spi_bus_lock(struct spi_master*) /* although struct spi_device* might +be easier */ +spi_bus_unlock(struct spi_master*) +spi_async_locked(struct spi_device*, struct spi_message*) +spi_sync_locked(struct spi_device*, struct spi_message*) + +Drivers can only call the last two if they already hold the spi_master_lock(). + +spi_bus_lock() obtains the mutex, obtains the spin lock, sets the +flag, and releases the spin lock before returning. It doesn't even +need to sleep while waiting for "in-flight" spi_transactions to +complete because its purpose is to guarantee no additional +transactions are added. It does not guarantee that the bus is idle. + +spi_bus_unlock() clears the flag and releases the mutex, which will +wake up any waiters. + +The difference between spi_async() and spi_async_locked() is that the +locked version bypasses the check of the lock flag. Both versions +need to obtain the spinlock. + +The difference between spi_sync() and spi_sync_locked() is that +spi_sync() must hold the mutex while enqueuing a new transfer. +spi_sync_locked() doesn't because the mutex is already held. Note +however that spi_sync must *not* continue to hold the mutex while +waiting for the transfer to complete, otherwise only one transfer +could be queued up at a time! + +Almost no code needs to be written. The current spi_async() and +spi_sync() can probably be renamed to __spi_async() and __spi_sync() +so that spi_async(), spi_sync(), spi_async_locked() and +spi_sync_locked() can just become wrappers around the common code. + +spi_sync() is protected by a mutex because it can sleep +spi_async() needs to be protected with a flag and a spinlock because +it can be called atomically and must not sleep + +Signed-off-by: Ernst Schwab <eschwab@online.de> +[grant.likely@secretlab.ca: use spin_lock_irqsave()] +Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> +Tested-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> +Tested-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it> +--- + drivers/spi/spi.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- + include/linux/spi/spi.h | 12 +++ + 2 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) + +--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c ++++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c +@@ -527,6 +527,10 @@ int spi_register_master(struct spi_maste + dynamic = 1; + } + ++ spin_lock_init(&master->bus_lock_spinlock); ++ mutex_init(&master->bus_lock_mutex); ++ master->bus_lock_flag = 0; ++ + /* register the device, then userspace will see it. + * registration fails if the bus ID is in use. + */ +@@ -666,6 +670,35 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) + } + EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_setup); + ++static int __spi_async(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message) ++{ ++ struct spi_master *master = spi->master; ++ ++ /* Half-duplex links include original MicroWire, and ones with ++ * only one data pin like SPI_3WIRE (switches direction) or where ++ * either MOSI or MISO is missing. They can also be caused by ++ * software limitations. ++ */ ++ if ((master->flags & SPI_MASTER_HALF_DUPLEX) ++ || (spi->mode & SPI_3WIRE)) { ++ struct spi_transfer *xfer; ++ unsigned flags = master->flags; ++ ++ list_for_each_entry(xfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) { ++ if (xfer->rx_buf && xfer->tx_buf) ++ return -EINVAL; ++ if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_TX) && xfer->tx_buf) ++ return -EINVAL; ++ if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_RX) && xfer->rx_buf) ++ return -EINVAL; ++ } ++ } ++ ++ message->spi = spi; ++ message->status = -EINPROGRESS; ++ return master->transfer(spi, message); ++} ++ + /** + * spi_async - asynchronous SPI transfer + * @spi: device with which data will be exchanged +@@ -698,33 +731,68 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_setup); + int spi_async(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message) + { + struct spi_master *master = spi->master; ++ int ret; ++ unsigned long flags; + +- /* Half-duplex links include original MicroWire, and ones with +- * only one data pin like SPI_3WIRE (switches direction) or where +- * either MOSI or MISO is missing. They can also be caused by +- * software limitations. +- */ +- if ((master->flags & SPI_MASTER_HALF_DUPLEX) +- || (spi->mode & SPI_3WIRE)) { +- struct spi_transfer *xfer; +- unsigned flags = master->flags; ++ spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags); + +- list_for_each_entry(xfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) { +- if (xfer->rx_buf && xfer->tx_buf) +- return -EINVAL; +- if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_TX) && xfer->tx_buf) +- return -EINVAL; +- if ((flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_RX) && xfer->rx_buf) +- return -EINVAL; +- } +- } ++ if (master->bus_lock_flag) ++ ret = -EBUSY; ++ else ++ ret = __spi_async(spi, message); + +- message->spi = spi; +- message->status = -EINPROGRESS; +- return master->transfer(spi, message); ++ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags); ++ ++ return ret; + } + EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_async); + ++/** ++ * spi_async_locked - version of spi_async with exclusive bus usage ++ * @spi: device with which data will be exchanged ++ * @message: describes the data transfers, including completion callback ++ * Context: any (irqs may be blocked, etc) ++ * ++ * This call may be used in_irq and other contexts which can't sleep, ++ * as well as from task contexts which can sleep. ++ * ++ * The completion callback is invoked in a context which can't sleep. ++ * Before that invocation, the value of message->status is undefined. ++ * When the callback is issued, message->status holds either zero (to ++ * indicate complete success) or a negative error code. After that ++ * callback returns, the driver which issued the transfer request may ++ * deallocate the associated memory; it's no longer in use by any SPI ++ * core or controller driver code. ++ * ++ * Note that although all messages to a spi_device are handled in ++ * FIFO order, messages may go to different devices in other orders. ++ * Some device might be higher priority, or have various "hard" access ++ * time requirements, for example. ++ * ++ * On detection of any fault during the transfer, processing of ++ * the entire message is aborted, and the device is deselected. ++ * Until returning from the associated message completion callback, ++ * no other spi_message queued to that device will be processed. ++ * (This rule applies equally to all the synchronous transfer calls, ++ * which are wrappers around this core asynchronous primitive.) ++ */ ++int spi_async_locked(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message) ++{ ++ struct spi_master *master = spi->master; ++ int ret; ++ unsigned long flags; ++ ++ spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags); ++ ++ ret = __spi_async(spi, message); ++ ++ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags); ++ ++ return ret; ++ ++} ++EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_async_locked); ++ + + /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ + +@@ -738,6 +806,32 @@ static void spi_complete(void *arg) + complete(arg); + } + ++static int __spi_sync(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message, ++ int bus_locked) ++{ ++ DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done); ++ int status; ++ struct spi_master *master = spi->master; ++ ++ message->complete = spi_complete; ++ message->context = &done; ++ ++ if (!bus_locked) ++ mutex_lock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); ++ ++ status = spi_async_locked(spi, message); ++ ++ if (!bus_locked) ++ mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); ++ ++ if (status == 0) { ++ wait_for_completion(&done); ++ status = message->status; ++ } ++ message->context = NULL; ++ return status; ++} ++ + /** + * spi_sync - blocking/synchronous SPI data transfers + * @spi: device with which data will be exchanged +@@ -761,21 +855,86 @@ static void spi_complete(void *arg) + */ + int spi_sync(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message) + { +- DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done); +- int status; +- +- message->complete = spi_complete; +- message->context = &done; +- status = spi_async(spi, message); +- if (status == 0) { +- wait_for_completion(&done); +- status = message->status; +- } +- message->context = NULL; +- return status; ++ return __spi_sync(spi, message, 0); + } + EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_sync); + ++/** ++ * spi_sync_locked - version of spi_sync with exclusive bus usage ++ * @spi: device with which data will be exchanged ++ * @message: describes the data transfers ++ * Context: can sleep ++ * ++ * This call may only be used from a context that may sleep. The sleep ++ * is non-interruptible, and has no timeout. Low-overhead controller ++ * drivers may DMA directly into and out of the message buffers. ++ * ++ * This call should be used by drivers that require exclusive access to the ++ * SPI bus. It has to be preceeded by a spi_bus_lock call. The SPI bus must ++ * be released by a spi_bus_unlock call when the exclusive access is over. ++ * ++ * It returns zero on success, else a negative error code. ++ */ ++int spi_sync_locked(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message) ++{ ++ return __spi_sync(spi, message, 1); ++} ++EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_sync_locked); ++ ++/** ++ * spi_bus_lock - obtain a lock for exclusive SPI bus usage ++ * @master: SPI bus master that should be locked for exclusive bus access ++ * Context: can sleep ++ * ++ * This call may only be used from a context that may sleep. The sleep ++ * is non-interruptible, and has no timeout. ++ * ++ * This call should be used by drivers that require exclusive access to the ++ * SPI bus. The SPI bus must be released by a spi_bus_unlock call when the ++ * exclusive access is over. Data transfer must be done by spi_sync_locked ++ * and spi_async_locked calls when the SPI bus lock is held. ++ * ++ * It returns zero on success, else a negative error code. ++ */ ++int spi_bus_lock(struct spi_master *master) ++{ ++ unsigned long flags; ++ ++ mutex_lock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); ++ ++ spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags); ++ master->bus_lock_flag = 1; ++ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bus_lock_spinlock, flags); ++ ++ /* mutex remains locked until spi_bus_unlock is called */ ++ ++ return 0; ++} ++EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_bus_lock); ++ ++/** ++ * spi_bus_unlock - release the lock for exclusive SPI bus usage ++ * @master: SPI bus master that was locked for exclusive bus access ++ * Context: can sleep ++ * ++ * This call may only be used from a context that may sleep. The sleep ++ * is non-interruptible, and has no timeout. ++ * ++ * This call releases an SPI bus lock previously obtained by an spi_bus_lock ++ * call. ++ * ++ * It returns zero on success, else a negative error code. ++ */ ++int spi_bus_unlock(struct spi_master *master) ++{ ++ master->bus_lock_flag = 0; ++ ++ mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); ++ ++ return 0; ++} ++EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_bus_unlock); ++ + /* portable code must never pass more than 32 bytes */ + #define SPI_BUFSIZ max(32,SMP_CACHE_BYTES) + +--- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h ++++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h +@@ -262,6 +262,13 @@ struct spi_master { + #define SPI_MASTER_NO_RX BIT(1) /* can't do buffer read */ + #define SPI_MASTER_NO_TX BIT(2) /* can't do buffer write */ + ++ /* lock and mutex for SPI bus locking */ ++ spinlock_t bus_lock_spinlock; ++ struct mutex bus_lock_mutex; ++ ++ /* flag indicating that the SPI bus is locked for exclusive use */ ++ bool bus_lock_flag; ++ + /* Setup mode and clock, etc (spi driver may call many times). + * + * IMPORTANT: this may be called when transfers to another +@@ -542,6 +549,8 @@ static inline void spi_message_free(stru + + extern int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi); + extern int spi_async(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message); ++extern int spi_async_locked(struct spi_device *spi, ++ struct spi_message *message); + + /*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ + +@@ -551,6 +560,9 @@ extern int spi_async(struct spi_device * + */ + + extern int spi_sync(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message); ++extern int spi_sync_locked(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message); ++extern int spi_bus_lock(struct spi_master *master); ++extern int spi_bus_unlock(struct spi_master *master); + + /** + * spi_write - SPI synchronous write diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/911-backport-mmc_spi-use-spi-bus-locking-api.patch b/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/911-backport-mmc_spi-use-spi-bus-locking-api.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d6ad3d4e9b --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.34/911-backport-mmc_spi-use-spi-bus-locking-api.patch @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +From 4751c1c74bc7b596db5de0c93be1a22a570145c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Ernst Schwab <eschwab@online.de> +Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:47:46 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] spi/mmc_spi: mmc_spi adaptations for SPI bus locking API + +Modification of the mmc_spi driver to use the SPI bus locking API. +With this, the mmc_spi driver can be used together with other SPI +devices on the same SPI bus. The exclusive access to the SPI bus is +now managed in the SPI layer. The counting of chip selects in the probe +function is no longer needed. + +Signed-off-by: Ernst Schwab <eschwab@online.de> +Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> +Tested-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> +Tested-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it> +--- + drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 59 ++++++++----------------------------------- + 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) + +--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c ++++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c +@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ mmc_spi_readbytes(struct mmc_spi_host *h + host->data_dma, sizeof(*host->data), + DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + +- status = spi_sync(host->spi, &host->readback); ++ status = spi_sync_locked(host->spi, &host->readback); + + if (host->dma_dev) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev, +@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ mmc_spi_command_send(struct mmc_spi_host + host->data_dma, sizeof(*host->data), + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); + } +- status = spi_sync(host->spi, &host->m); ++ status = spi_sync_locked(host->spi, &host->m); + + if (host->dma_dev) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev, +@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ mmc_spi_writeblock(struct mmc_spi_host * + host->data_dma, sizeof(*scratch), + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); + +- status = spi_sync(spi, &host->m); ++ status = spi_sync_locked(spi, &host->m); + + if (status != 0) { + dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "write error (%d)\n", status); +@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ mmc_spi_readblock(struct mmc_spi_host *h + DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + } + +- status = spi_sync(spi, &host->m); ++ status = spi_sync_locked(spi, &host->m); + + if (host->dma_dev) { + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev, +@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ mmc_spi_data_do(struct mmc_spi_host *hos + host->data_dma, sizeof(*scratch), + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); + +- tmp = spi_sync(spi, &host->m); ++ tmp = spi_sync_locked(spi, &host->m); + + if (host->dma_dev) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev, +@@ -1084,6 +1084,9 @@ static void mmc_spi_request(struct mmc_h + } + #endif + ++ /* request exclusive bus access */ ++ spi_bus_lock(host->spi->master); ++ + /* issue command; then optionally data and stop */ + status = mmc_spi_command_send(host, mrq, mrq->cmd, mrq->data != NULL); + if (status == 0 && mrq->data) { +@@ -1094,6 +1097,9 @@ static void mmc_spi_request(struct mmc_h + mmc_cs_off(host); + } + ++ /* release the bus */ ++ spi_bus_unlock(host->spi->master); ++ + mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq); + } + +@@ -1290,23 +1296,6 @@ mmc_spi_detect_irq(int irq, void *mmc) + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + +-struct count_children { +- unsigned n; +- struct bus_type *bus; +-}; +- +-static int maybe_count_child(struct device *dev, void *c) +-{ +- struct count_children *ccp = c; +- +- if (dev->bus == ccp->bus) { +- if (ccp->n) +- return -EBUSY; +- ccp->n++; +- } +- return 0; +-} +- + static int mmc_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi) + { + void *ones; +@@ -1338,32 +1327,6 @@ static int mmc_spi_probe(struct spi_devi + return status; + } + +- /* We can use the bus safely iff nobody else will interfere with us. +- * Most commands consist of one SPI message to issue a command, then +- * several more to collect its response, then possibly more for data +- * transfer. Clocking access to other devices during that period will +- * corrupt the command execution. +- * +- * Until we have software primitives which guarantee non-interference, +- * we'll aim for a hardware-level guarantee. +- * +- * REVISIT we can't guarantee another device won't be added later... +- */ +- if (spi->master->num_chipselect > 1) { +- struct count_children cc; +- +- cc.n = 0; +- cc.bus = spi->dev.bus; +- status = device_for_each_child(spi->dev.parent, &cc, +- maybe_count_child); +- if (status < 0) { +- dev_err(&spi->dev, "can't share SPI bus\n"); +- return status; +- } +- +- dev_warn(&spi->dev, "ASSUMING SPI bus stays unshared!\n"); +- } +- + /* We need a supply of ones to transmit. This is the only time + * the CPU touches these, so cache coherency isn't a concern. + * |