aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/package/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>2021-10-24 02:45:25 +0200
committerChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>2021-10-24 11:20:22 +0200
commit36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04 (patch)
tree376e9c0a8fd1a3efc23bb8852dce410fe53d2585 /package/kernel
parentcb11eaf5dd2f443f46f1f73109a16c15551c2f3a (diff)
downloadupstream-36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04.tar.gz
upstream-36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04.tar.bz2
upstream-36104dc51f5a4fef961b97aaaa8dfe753dfb5e04.zip
kernel: 5.10: silence bogus "Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider" warnings
Rosen reported strange dtc warnings that had their origin in an upstream patch to 5.8-rc1. Upon further digging this revealed an ongoing thread [0] discussing the topic: > [...]I don't think we need a bunch of warning fix patches to add > these everywhere. Also, the need for #address-cells pretty much makes > no sense on any modern system. It is a relic from days when the bus > (address) topology and interrupt topology were related. and later on: > So really, we only need to be checking for #address-cells in nodes > with interrupt-map. This patch backports just the patch which removed the warning message (this is from the upstream dtc project [1] - but not the kernel). the patch does not add the checking of the #address-cells in nodes with interrupt-map. [0] <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/91e3405245c89f134676449cf3822285798d2ed2.1612189652.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com/> [1] <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git/commit/?id=d8d1a9a77863a8c7031ae82a1d461aa78eb72a7b> Link: <https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4685> Reported-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'package/kernel')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions