aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorÁlvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>2021-02-18 18:04:33 +0100
committerÁlvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>2021-02-18 23:42:32 +0100
commitf07e572f6447465d8938679533d604e402b0f066 (patch)
treecb333bd2a67e59e7c07659514850a0fd55fc825e /target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch
parent5d3a6fd970619dfc55f8259035c3027d7613a2a6 (diff)
downloadupstream-f07e572f6447465d8938679533d604e402b0f066.tar.gz
upstream-f07e572f6447465d8938679533d604e402b0f066.tar.bz2
upstream-f07e572f6447465d8938679533d604e402b0f066.zip
bcm27xx: import latest patches from the RPi foundation
bcm2708: boot tested on RPi B+ v1.2 bcm2709: boot tested on RPi 3B v1.2 and RPi 4B v1.1 4G bcm2710: boot tested on RPi 3B v1.2 bcm2711: boot tested on RPi 4B v1.1 4G Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch')
-rw-r--r--target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch56
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch b/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..55f86ae340
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0512-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-clk_hw_register-for-pllb_arm.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+From 3a4163613b7f6e628e7b5a0d3a546523d1d03bb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
+Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:40:00 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] clk: bcm: rpi: Use clk_hw_register for pllb_arm
+
+The pllb_arm clock is defined as a fixed factor clock with the pllb clock
+as a parent. However, all its configuration is entirely static, and thus we
+don't really need to call clk_hw_register_fixed_factor() but can simply call
+clk_hw_register() with a static clk_fixed_factor structure.
+
+Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
+Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
+Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
+Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
+---
+ drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
+ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
++++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
+@@ -225,16 +225,28 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(str
+ return devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &rpi->pllb);
+ }
+
++static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = {
++ .mult = 1,
++ .div = 2,
++ .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
++ .name = "pllb_arm",
++ .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pllb" },
++ .num_parents = 1,
++ .ops = &clk_fixed_factor_ops,
++ .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
++ },
++};
++
+ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
+ {
+- rpi->pllb_arm = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(rpi->dev,
+- "pllb_arm", "pllb",
+- CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
+- 1, 2);
+- if (IS_ERR(rpi->pllb_arm)) {
++ int ret;
++
++ ret = clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw);
++ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to initialize pllb_arm\n");
+- return PTR_ERR(rpi->pllb_arm);
++ return ret;
+ }
++ rpi->pllb_arm = &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw;
+
+ rpi->pllb_arm_lookup = clkdev_hw_create(rpi->pllb_arm, NULL, "cpu0");
+ if (!rpi->pllb_arm_lookup) {