aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/015-rt2x00-do-not-set-IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK-on-tx-status.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/015-rt2x00-do-not-set-IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK-on-tx-status.patch')
-rw-r--r--package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/015-rt2x00-do-not-set-IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK-on-tx-status.patch50
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/015-rt2x00-do-not-set-IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK-on-tx-status.patch b/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/015-rt2x00-do-not-set-IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK-on-tx-status.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a4497df475..0000000000
--- a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/rt2x00/015-rt2x00-do-not-set-IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK-on-tx-status.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-From patchwork Fri Aug 23 07:09:56 2019
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
-X-Patchwork-Id: 11110703
-X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com
-From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
-Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: do not set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK on tx
- status
-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:09:56 +0200
-Message-Id: <1566544196-20371-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
-Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
-List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>
-X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
-
-According to documentation IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK is suppose
-to be used when we do not recive BA (BlockAck). However on rt2x00 we
-use it when remote station fail to decode one or more subframes within
-AMPDU (some bits are not set in BlockAck bitmap). Setting the flag result
-in sent of BAR (BlockAck Request) frame and this might result of abuse
-of BA session, since remote station can sent BA with incorrect
-sequence numbers after receiving BAR. This problem is visible especially
-when connecting two rt2800 devices.
-
-Previously I observed some performance benefits when using the flag
-when connecting with iwlwifi devices. But currently possibly due
-to reacent changes in rt2x00 removing the flag has no effect on
-those test cases.
-
-So remove the IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK.
-
-Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
----
- drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c | 3 ---
- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
-+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
-@@ -371,9 +371,6 @@ static void rt2x00lib_fill_tx_status(str
- IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
- tx_info->status.ampdu_len = 1;
- tx_info->status.ampdu_ack_len = success ? 1 : 0;
--
-- if (!success)
-- tx_info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK;
- }
-
- if (rate_flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_RTS_CTS) {