Merge branch 'master' into fix_death_test_child_mingw_wer_issue1116

4 files changed, 8 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md
index f8bbbfe6..d54dd16a 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ The `argument` can be either a C string or a C++ string object:
 
 `ContainsRegex()` and `MatchesRegex()` use the regular expression
 syntax defined
-[here](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#regular-expression-syntax).
+[here](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#regular-expression-syntax).
 `StrCaseEq()`, `StrCaseNe()`, `StrEq()`, and `StrNe()` work for wide
 strings as well.
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers:
 
 ## Matchers as Test Assertions ##
 
-|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](../../googletest/docs/Primer.md#assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.|
+|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](../../googletest/docs/primer.md#assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.|
 |:---------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 |`EXPECT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a non-fatal failure if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.                                                          |
 
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
index 3737d030..8809b0e7 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
@@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ enum class AccessLevel { kInternal, kPublic };
 
 class Buzz {
  public:
-  explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { … }
+  explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { ... }
   ...
 };
 
@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ Note that `ByMove()` is essential here - if you drop it, the code won’t compil
 
 Quiz time! What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is
 performed more than once (e.g. you write
-`….WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first
+`.WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first
 time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only
 value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a
 run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once.
@@ -3655,6 +3655,6 @@ This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL
 containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator.  For other
 types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the
 user can figure it out.
-[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values)
+[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values)
 explains how to extend the printer to do a better job at
 printing your particular type than to dump the bytes.
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md
index 76910569..566a34e5 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Admittedly, this test is contrived and doesn't do much. You can easily achieve t
 
 ## Using Google Mock with Any Testing Framework ##
 If you want to use something other than Google Test (e.g. [CppUnit](http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit/) or
-[CxxTest](http://cxxtest.tigris.org/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to:
+[CxxTest](https://cxxtest.com/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to:
 ```
 int main(int argc, char** argv) {
   // The following line causes Google Mock to throw an exception on failure,
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ sometimes causes the test program to crash.  You'll still be able to
 notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure.
 
 A better solution is to use Google Test's
-[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events)
+[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events)
 to report a test failure to your testing framework properly.  You'll need to
 implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it
 should be straightforward.
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md
index ccaa3d7a..9008c637 100644
--- a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md
+++ b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ interface, which then can be easily mocked.  It's a bit of work
 initially, but usually pays for itself quickly.
 
 This Google Testing Blog
-[post](http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html)
+[post](https://testing.googleblog.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html)
 says it excellently.  Check it out.
 
 ## My mock object needs to do complex stuff.  It's a lot of pain to specify the actions.  Google Mock sucks! ##
@@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ See this [recipe](CookBook.md#mocking_side_effects) for more details and an exam
 If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are
 some other resources you can use:
 
-  1. read other [documentation](Documentation.md),
   1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock/topics),
   1. ask it on [googlemock@googlegroups.com](mailto:googlemock@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) before you can post.).