diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'googlemock/docs')
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/CookBook.md | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md | 3 |
4 files changed, 8 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md index f8bbbfe6..d54dd16a 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ The `argument` can be either a C string or a C++ string object: `ContainsRegex()` and `MatchesRegex()` use the regular expression syntax defined -[here](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#regular-expression-syntax). +[here](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#regular-expression-syntax). `StrCaseEq()`, `StrCaseNe()`, `StrEq()`, and `StrNe()` work for wide strings as well. @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers: ## Matchers as Test Assertions ## -|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](../../googletest/docs/Primer.md#assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| +|`ASSERT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a [fatal failure](../../googletest/docs/primer.md#assertions) if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`.| |:---------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |`EXPECT_THAT(expression, m)`|Generates a non-fatal failure if the value of `expression` doesn't match matcher `m`. | diff --git a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md index 3737d030..8809b0e7 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md @@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ enum class AccessLevel { kInternal, kPublic }; class Buzz { public: - explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { … } + explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { ... } ... }; @@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ Note that `ByMove()` is essential here - if you drop it, the code won’t compil Quiz time! What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is performed more than once (e.g. you write -`….WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first +`.WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once. @@ -3655,6 +3655,6 @@ This printer knows how to print built-in C++ types, native arrays, STL containers, and any type that supports the `<<` operator. For other types, it prints the raw bytes in the value and hopes that you the user can figure it out. -[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values) +[Google Test's advanced guide](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#teaching-google-test-how-to-print-your-values) explains how to extend the printer to do a better job at printing your particular type than to dump the bytes. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md index 76910569..566a34e5 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Admittedly, this test is contrived and doesn't do much. You can easily achieve t ## Using Google Mock with Any Testing Framework ## If you want to use something other than Google Test (e.g. [CppUnit](http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit/) or -[CxxTest](http://cxxtest.tigris.org/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: +[CxxTest](https://cxxtest.com/)) as your testing framework, just change the `main()` function in the previous section to: ``` int main(int argc, char** argv) { // The following line causes Google Mock to throw an exception on failure, @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ sometimes causes the test program to crash. You'll still be able to notice that the test has failed, but it's not a graceful failure. A better solution is to use Google Test's -[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/AdvancedGuide.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events) +[event listener API](../../googletest/docs/advanced.md#extending-google-test-by-handling-test-events) to report a test failure to your testing framework properly. You'll need to implement the `OnTestPartResult()` method of the event listener interface, but it should be straightforward. diff --git a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md index ccaa3d7a..9008c637 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ interface, which then can be easily mocked. It's a bit of work initially, but usually pays for itself quickly. This Google Testing Blog -[post](http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) +[post](https://testing.googleblog.com/2008/06/defeat-static-cling.html) says it excellently. Check it out. ## My mock object needs to do complex stuff. It's a lot of pain to specify the actions. Google Mock sucks! ## @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ See this [recipe](CookBook.md#mocking_side_effects) for more details and an exam If you cannot find the answer to your question in this FAQ, there are some other resources you can use: - 1. read other [documentation](Documentation.md), 1. search the mailing list [archive](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock/topics), 1. ask it on [googlemock@googlegroups.com](mailto:googlemock@googlegroups.com) and someone will answer it (to prevent spam, we require you to join the [discussion group](http://groups.google.com/group/googlemock) before you can post.). |